Begin a conversation.
Whether you are a training provider weighing a project, a practitioner considering joining us, or simply curious, a note is always welcome. You will hear from us within two working days.
A conversation before a quote.
Twenty minutes, by phone or by email. We will tell you, candidly, whether the work is something we should take on, and what it would cost.
Begin the conversation →
2birds, alongside a typical vendor.
Six places where the choice of practitioner matters, in handling rather than in slogans.
- Subject-matter expert sourcing
- Left to the training provider to source alone, and the SME found may not qualify for SWDA submission.
- Sourced for you from our community, so your submission is never held back.
- DACE or DDDLP accredited developers
- May not be registered to the TAEPP framework. From 1 April 2026, AEs who wish to deliver SWDA-supported training must be on the National Adult Educator Registry.
- Yes, with a public TAEPP record. We provide the CVs of one Level 1 Associate AE and one Level 3 Senior Professional AE for courseware submission.
- Audit clarification response
- A single developer answers SWDA's auditor enquiries, typically within a five working day window.
- Team delivery means faster turnaround, supported by legal training that lets us justify our pedagogical outcomes to SWDA auditors.
- TPGateway submission support
- Typically not offered, or charged separately.
- Included with every courseware engagement, as we hold direct access to the TPGateway portal.
- Submission record and experience
- Often a single hand, with limited courseware submission experience.
- Close to one hundred submissions, made as a team, holding qualifications such as DDDLP, DACE, ACLP, ACTA, IAL-SAE and LL.B.
- Marketing assets
- Not provided, or referred to a separate vendor.
- Handled by the firm, providing one complimentary marketing asset in a digital copy.
A typical curriculum vendor describes the common market alternative, not any particular provider.
Years of work, and the community that has grown around it.
Each is an organisation we have worked in, developed for, sat with, or supplied with a developer, an adult educator or a subject-matter expert.
A short note of what you are looking to achieve is enough to begin. If you are able to tell us the nature of the course, your intended timeline and whether you are an existing or prospective training organisation, we can come to the first conversation already prepared. Nothing formal is required at this stage.
It is not. The first consultation, around twenty minutes by phone or email, is offered without charge and without obligation. Its purpose is to understand the project, its timeline and the form of SWDA funding that suits the course, and to give you a candid view of whether it is a project we should take on and what it is likely to cost.
We do, and frequently. Much of our ATO setup work is undertaken for organisations entering the sector for the first time. If you are still weighing whether to do so, the first conversation is the right place to begin.
They are. Anything you share with us, whether in the first conversation or thereafter, is treated as confidential and is not disclosed to any third party. Where a project calls for it, we are glad to put a formal confidentiality undertaking in place before we begin.
The shortest path is a note.
If you have read this far, the proposal is simple. Send us a note, in plain words, about the work you have in mind. We will reply within two working days, in the same plain manner.