A complete curriculum-development engagement leaves behind a set of printed instruments, not a slide deck. At its narrowest, that is the Course Proposal Form, the lesson and assessment plans, and the trainer guide. At its broadest, for a full WSQ pathway, it extends to the competency map, the assessment rubrics, the trainer briefing pack and the moderation procedures that hold the programme together over time.
Every artefact carries a version line and a change log. Every assessment instrument is traceable back to the competency map, and from the competency map back to the brief. This is what the auditor looks for during the Course Quality Check, and what holds the programme together long after the first cohort.
Where your brief calls for it, marketing collateral is included at no additional charge, provided as-is, in the same restrained register as the rest of the practice, and without further revision rounds.